Abstract
Previous articleNext article No AccessCritiques & ContentionsOn the Historiography of Science: A Reply to PerrinEvan M. MelhadoEvan M. Melhado Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Isis Volume 81, Number 2Jun., 1990 Publication of the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/355339 Views: 3Total views on this site Citations: 3Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1989 History of Science Society, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Mi Gyung Kim From phlogiston to caloric: chemical ontologies, Foundations of Chemistry 13, no.33 (Oct 2011): 201–222.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-011-9116-yElizabeth Garber Eighteenth—Century Physics and Mathematics: A Reassessment, (Jan 1999): 63–91.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1766-4_3Prajit K. Basu Similarities and dissimilarities between Joseph Priestley's and Antoine Lavoisier's chemical beliefs, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23, no.33 (Sep 1992): 445–469.https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(92)90004-P
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
