Abstract

The emotion perceived in a face can be influenced by prior exposure to a face expressing a different emotion. Here we show that displacement along a particular emotional axis, that encoding happiness and sadness, can be effected solely by a systematic change in the angle, at the center of the mouth, between the left and right halves of the mouth. We then demonstrate that adaptation to a face with the mouth distorted to change this angle, such that the face expresses an emotion on this axis, causes a face with a neutral expression to be perceived as having the opposite expression. By abstracting the mouths from the faces and examining the magnitude of the angle aftereffects in the mouths alone and in an unfamiliar orientation, we show that the magnitudes of the angle aftereffects are sufficient to account for the changes in perceived emotion in the faces. Further, by applying the distortion to the mouths asymmetrically so that the distortion is manifested by a change in orientation of the mouth stimulus rather than a change in angle, we show that the magnitude of the aftereffect can be predicted by the local tilt aftereffect. We argue, therefore, that the aftereffects of emotion are due to misperception of morphology of the face and that the misperception is due to the local change in perceived orientation due to the systematic application of the tilt aftereffect in a tilt aftereffect field. All adaptation experiments were performed using stimuli that were either high-pass or low-pass filtered for spatial frequency. Results showed that the spatial frequency specificity of the aftereffects was the same for the face, angled mouth, and oriented mouth stimuli, lending further support to the hypothesis that the aftereffects are instantiated in processes early in the visual cortex and that the aftereffects assumed to be higher level are, in fact, inherited.

Highlights

  • Concerning the study of the functionality of mechanisms of the brain a frequently cited aphorism is that aftereffects represent the psychologist’s microelectrode (Frisby, 1979)

  • It is clear from the data that adaptation to a stimulus that is concave to the left, for example, results in a decrease in the probability of reporting that the test stimuli are concave to the left

  • The expression of the face is in this instance, entirely dictated by the shape of the mouth and the magnitude and direction of the aftereffect can be predicted by an angle aftereffect introduced into a straight mouth, abstracted from the face, by adaptation to the manipulated angled mouth used in the face adaptor

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Concerning the study of the functionality of mechanisms of the brain a frequently cited aphorism is that aftereffects represent the psychologist’s microelectrode (Frisby, 1979). Adaptation to a sinusoidal grating of a particular orientation results in a notch in the graph describing contrast sensitivity to the same grating as a function of orientation (Gilinsky, 1968; Blakemore and Campbell, 1969) but not in that of a grating with a substantially different frequency (Blakemore and Campbell, 1969). This leads to the assumption that, on a local level, the visual system is tuned for gratings of a particular orientation and spatial frequency. This observation suggests that the sensitivity that is lost www.frontiersin.org

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call