Abstract

This paper surveys accounting research as seen through the eyes of international accounting researchers. Several studies have been published by researchers across the globe in both American and non-American accounting research journals critical of not only the dominant accounting research construct, but also of university affiliation of editors and peer-reviewers, editorial control of “elite” accounting journals, and the peer-review process. There is remarkable similarity and substantial agreement in the conclusions reached. The hegemony of the accounting research construct has stifled innovative accounting research and research methods, suppressed the diversity of accounting research, and dampened the importance and impact of authentic international accounting research.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.