Abstract

In a previous work, a Feller process called Liouville Brownian motion on $\mathbb{R}^2$ has been introduced. It can be seen as a Brownian motion evolving in a random given formally by the exponential of a (massive) Gaussian Free Field $e^{\gamma\, X}$ and is the right diffusion process to consider regarding $2d$-Liouville quantum gravity. In this note, we discuss the construction of the associated Dirichlet form, following essentially Fukushima, Oshima, and Takeda, and the techniques introduced in our previous work. Then we carry out the analysis of the Liouville resolvent. In particular, we prove that it is strong Feller, thus obtaining the existence of the Liouville heat kernel via a non-trivial theorem of Fukushima and al. One of the motivations which led to introduce the Liouville Brownian motion in our previous work was to investigate the puzzling Liouville metric through the eyes of this new stochastic process. In particular, the theory developed for example in Stollmann and Sturm, whose aim is to capture the geometry of the underlying space out of the Dirichlet form of a process living on that space, suggests a notion of distance associated to a Dirichlet form. More precisely, under some mild hypothesis on the regularity of the Dirichlet form, they provide a distance in the wide sense, called intrinsic metric, which is interpreted as an extension of Riemannian geometry applicable to non differential structures. We prove that the needed mild hypotheses are satisfied but that the associated intrinsic metric unfortunately vanishes, thus showing that renormalization theory remains out of reach of the metric aspect of Dirichlet forms.

Highlights

  • Background on the geometric theory ofDirichlet forms and extension of Riemannian geometryAs a strongly local regular Dirichlet form, (Σ, F ) can be written asΣ(f, g) = dΓ(f, g) (4.1)where Γ is a positive semidefinite, symmetric bilinear form on F with values in the signed Radon measures on R2

  • The time changed Dirichlet form constructed in [13, Theorem 6.2.1] corresponds to that of a Hunt process Ht = BA−t 1 where B is a standard Brownian motion and A−t 1 is the inverse of the positive continuous additive functional (PCAF) (At)t

  • There is no general theory on Dirichlet forms which enables to get rid of this polar set, constructing a PCAF in the strict sense and a Hunt process starting from all points of D

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dirichlet forms and extension of Riemannian geometry. As a strongly local regular Dirichlet form, (Σ, F ) can be written as. Where Γ is a positive semidefinite, symmetric bilinear form on F with values in the signed Radon measures on R2 (the so-called energy measure). Denoting by Pt(x, dy) the transition probabilities of the semi-group, the energy measure can be defined by the formula φ dΓ(f, f) Σ(f, φf Σ(f. Let us denote by Floc = {f ∈ L2loc(D, M ); Γ(f, f ) is a Radon measure}. The energy measure defines in an intrinsic way a distance in the wide sense dX on D by dX(x, y) = sup{f (x) − f (y); f ∈ Floc ∩ C(D), Γ(f, f ) M }

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call