Abstract
In this paper we study the relation between the frequency of mandatory financial disclosures, the amount of information voluntarily disclosed by privately informed managers, and the resulting informational efficiency of stock prices. Our analysis emphasizes the confirmatory role of mandatory financial reports and uses frequency to highlight the difference between this view of reporting and the prevailing view of mandatory disclosures as sources of information. We model the mandatory financial disclosures as verifiable but noisy and, possibly, late signals of management's private value-relevant information. Accordingly, financial statements may be of little use as a timely, primary source of information for the purpose of valuing the firm. However, since the audited statements can be used to evaluate the truthfulness of management's past voluntary disclosures (i.e., to confirm that they are indeed truthfully, they may be useful in creating an environment in which management
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.