Abstract

Gas turbines for power generation are optimised to run with fossil fuels but as a response to tighter pollutant regulations and to enable the use of renewable fuels there is a great interest in improving fuel flexibility. One interesting renewable fuel is syngas from biomass gasification but its properties vary depending on the feedstock and gasification principle, and are significantly different from conventional fuels. This paper aims to give an overview of the differences in combustion behaviour by comparing numerical solutions with methane and several different synthesis gas compositions. The TECFLAM swirl burner geometry, which is designed to be representative of common gas turbine burners, was selected for comparison. The advantage with this geometry is that detailed experimental measurements with methane are publicly available. A two-stage approach was employed with development and validation of an advanced CFD model against experimental data for methane combustion followed by simulations with four syngas mixtures. The validated model was used to compare the flame shape and other characteristics of the flow between methane, 40% hydrogen enriched methane and four typical syngas compositions. It was found that the syngas cases experience lower swirl intensity due to high axial velocities that weakens the inner recirculation zone. Moreover, the higher laminar flame speed of the syngas cases has a strong effect on the flame front shape by bending it away from the axial direction, by making it shorter and by increasing the curvature of the flame front. A hypothesis that the flame shape and position is primarily governed by the laminar flame speed is supported by the almost identical flame shapes for bark powder syngas and 40% hydrogen enriched methane. These gas mixtures have almost identical laminar flame speeds for the relevant equivalence ratios but the heating value of the syngas is more than a factor of 3 smaller than that of the hydrogen enriched methane. The syngas compositions used are representative of practical gasification processes and biomass feedstocks. The demonstrated strong correlation between laminar flame speed and flame shape could be used as a rule of thumb to quickly judge whether the flame might come in contact with the structure or in other ways be detrimental to the function of the combustion system.

Highlights

  • Integration of biomass gasification and a combined cycle power plant (Bio-IGCC) is an attractive option for balancing the future power grid, which is expected to have a large fraction of intermittent wind and/or solar power (Varone and Ferrari 2015)

  • The main difference between Bio-IGCC and conventional IGCC is the composition of the fuel that is burned in the gas turbine

  • The fuels that are commonly used in conventional IGCC are characterised by high Higher Heating Values (HHV) and moderate flame speeds while the syngas that is used in Bio-IGCC has significantly lower HHV and higher flame speed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Integration of biomass gasification and a combined cycle power plant (Bio-IGCC) is an attractive option for balancing the future power grid, which is expected to have a large fraction of intermittent wind and/or solar power (Varone and Ferrari 2015). The main difference between Bio-IGCC and conventional IGCC is the composition of the fuel that is burned in the gas turbine. The fuels that are commonly used in conventional IGCC are characterised by high Higher Heating Values (HHV) and moderate flame speeds while the syngas that is used in Bio-IGCC has significantly lower HHV and higher flame speed. There is a significant variability of the syngas composition in Bio-IGCC depending on the feedstock and the gasifier type. One way to enable the use of existing gas turbines in Bio-IGCC would be to convert the syngas to Substitute Natural Gas (Thunman et al 2018). Fuel flexible gas turbines that are capable of combusting all types of biomass syngas are an enabling technology for Bio-IGCC

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call