Abstract
We study here the language Datalog(≠), which is the query language obtained from Datalog by allowing equalities and inequalities in the bodies of the rules. We view Datalog(≠) as a fragment of an infinitary logic L ω and show that L ω can be characterized in terms of certain two-person pebble games. This characterization provides us with tools for investigating the expressive power of Datalog(≠). As a case study, we classify the expressibility of fixed subgraph homeomorphism queries on directed graphs. S. Fortune, J. Hopcroft, and J. Wyllie ( Theoret. Comput. Sci. 10 (1980), 111-121) classified the computational complexity of these queries by establishing two dichotomies, which are proper only if P ≠ NP. Without using any complexity-theoretic assumptions, we show here that the two dichotomies are indeed proper in terms of expressibility in Datalog(≠).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
