Abstract
In a recent survey Sutherland and Dewhurst itemized the extent to which various types of departments expected selected mathematical topics in the background of incoming undergraduates. Using the results of diagnostic tests it is possible to estimate the actual capability of students with given prior qualifications to provide a ‘probable preparedness’ in specific topics. This paper compares expectations with probable preparedness in a range of topics. It is found that while some departments have realistic expectations about the background of their incoming students, others seem over-optimistic about the mathematical knowledge of today's students. Sometimes, topics that the department actually requires must in fact be covered ab initio with the students that they recruit.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
