Abstract
In this note we analyse the excess in the W + W − inclusive cross section recently measured at the LHC. We point out that in fact for the ATLAS fiducial cross sections there is no excess in the measurements compared to the NLO QCD predictions. We also argue that higher order effects to the fiducial cross section are small, and tend to cancel each other, hence the inclusion of NNLO and NNLL corrections will not modify this agreement significantly. We find that at 8 TeV a substantial part of the disagreement with the NLO prediction for the total cross section observed by ATLAS is due to the extrapolation carried out with POWHEG.
Highlights
The effect of the extrapolation from the fiducial region to the inclusive one
We find that at 8 TeV a substantial part of the disagreement with the NLO prediction for the total cross section observed by ATLAS is due to the extrapolation carried out with POWHEG
In the present section we investigate the effect of parton shower and hadronisation on the fiducial cross section using the POWHEG BOX [18,19,20], where the NLO prediction for W +W − production is matched to a parton shower [21, 22]
Summary
We present here theory predictions for the fiducial cross section as defined by the ATLAS experiment at a centre-of-mass energy of 8 TeV [2]. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of two in either direction and keeping μR = μF With this setup we get a total inclusive W +W − cross section of 53.6+−11..40 pb (56.5+−11..51 pb) excluding (including) Higgs mediation. The measured fiducial cross sections at 8 TeV are reported in the first column of table 2, together with the total NLO predictions in the fourth column. Since at the moment the by far dominant uncertainty is the systematic one, and since several theoretical improvements are possible on the theory numbers quoted above (inclusion of NNLL resummation effects [26, 27] matched to exact NNLO predictions [17], and NNLL threshold resummation in the total cross section [25]), we do not try to quantify the theory error in a more precise way. The ATLAS analysis at 8 TeV use the POWHEG, so we consider this generator
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.