Abstract
The difference from 4 to 6 σ in the Hubble constant (H0) between the values observed with the local (Cepheids and Supernovae Ia, SNe Ia) and the high-z probes (Cosmic Microwave Background obtained by the Planck data) still challenges the astrophysics and cosmology community. Previous analysis has shown that there is an evolution in the Hubble constant that scales as f(z)=H0/(1+z)η, where H0 is H0(z=0) and η is the evolutionary parameter. Here, we investigate if this evolution still holds by using the SNe Ia gathered in the Pantheon sample and the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations. We assume H0=70kms−1Mpc−1 as the local value and divide the Pantheon into three bins ordered in increasing values of redshift. Similar to our previous analysis but varying two cosmological parameters contemporaneously (H0, Ω0m in the ΛCDM model and H0, wa in the w0waCDM model), for each bin we implement a Markov-Chain Monte Carlo analysis (MCMC) obtaining the value of H0 assuming Gaussian priors to restrict the parameters spaces to values we expect from our prior knowledge of the current cosmological models and to avoid phantom Dark Energy models with w<−1. Subsequently, the values of H0 are fitted with the model f(z). Our results show that a decreasing trend with η∼10−2 is still visible in this sample. The η coefficient reaches zero in 2.0 σ for the ΛCDM model up to 5.8 σ for w0waCDM model. This trend, if not due to statistical fluctuations, could be explained through a hidden astrophysical bias, such as the effect of stretch evolution, or it requires new theoretical models, a possible proposition is the modified gravity theories, f(R). This analysis is meant to further cast light on the evolution of H0 and it does not specifically focus on constraining the other parameters. This work is also a preparatory to understand how the combined probes still show an evolution of the H0 by redshift and what is the current status of simulations on GRB cosmology to obtain the uncertainties on the Ω0m comparable with the ones achieved through SNe Ia.
Highlights
The ΛCDM model is one of the most accredited models, which implies an accelerated expansion phase [1,2]
W0 wa CDM models are briefly introduced together with SNe Ia properties; Section 3 describes the use of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAOs) as cosmological rulers; Section 4 contains our binned analysis results, after slicing the PS in 3 redshift bins for the aforementioned models, and assuming locally H0 = 70; in Section 5, we investigate, through simulated events, how the GRBs will be contributing to cosmological investigations by 2030; in Section 6 we discuss the results; in Section 7 we test the Hu–Sawicki model through a binning approach; in Section 8 we report an overview on the requirements that a suitable f ( R) model should have to properly describe the observed trend of H0 and in Section 9 our conclusions are reported
Gravity in the Jordan Frame (JF) is a possible candidate to account for the observed effect of H0 (z), but the accomplishment of a satisfactory model for the whole ΛCDM phase requires a significant effort in further investigation, especially accounting for the constraints that observations in the local universe provided for modified gravity
Summary
The ΛCDM model is one of the most accredited models, which implies an accelerated expansion phase [1,2]. The current paper is composed as expressed in the following: in Section 2 the ΛCDM and w0 wa CDM models are briefly introduced together with SNe Ia properties; Section 3 describes the use of BAOs as cosmological rulers; Section 4 contains our binned analysis results, after slicing the PS in 3 redshift bins for the aforementioned models, and assuming locally H0 = 70; in Section 5, we investigate, through simulated events, how the GRBs will be contributing to cosmological investigations by 2030; in Section 6 we discuss the results; in Section 7 we test the Hu–Sawicki model through a binning approach; in Section 8 we report an overview on the requirements that a suitable f ( R) model should have to properly describe the observed trend of H0 and in Section 9 our conclusions are reported
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
