Abstract

A new hypothesis is established for the evolution of anisogamy in isogamous monoecious haploid unicells. Contrary to present concepts, it is assumed that in such isogamous ancestors the genetically identical gametes are bipolarly different as (+) and (−). The gametic differentiation of a monoecious taxon may be perceived as a phenocopy of that of a related dioecious form. The two gametic phenotypes result from alternative pathways of sexual differentiation. The alternative must be controlled by a sensible switch mechanism that responds to minor differences between vegetative cells when gametogenesis is triggered. Cell-size dependent factors are assumed to be able to influence the switch mechanism causing bigger cells to be of one sex, smaller cells of the other. Fertilization then occurs selectively between big and small gametes because of their sexual difference. Size-different gametes within one species may arise from different types of gametogenesis depending on how many gametes one vegetative cell produces. These assumptions, i.e. the bipolarity of isogametes, in monoecious taxa, size-dependent sex determination, and different types of gametogenesis within one taxon, are justifiable since they are realized independently from each other in various species. It is postulated that mutational fixation of the size-dependent sex determination in such monoecious species creates cell lineages producing sex-different macro- and microgametes and establishes constitutional anisogamous dioecy. The proposed hypothesis clearly separates the evolution of anisogamy as a problem of sexual reproduction from the evolution of sex per se, sex being defined as a bipolarity effecting fertilization.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.