Abstract

Three methods for estimating the ionospheric frequency modulation of HF skywave signals are compared. In the first one, the instantaneous frequency is obtained by taking the time derivative of the phase of the signal, whereas, in the two other methods, autoregressive modeling using Burg and Marple algorithms is performed. High-quality signals propagated via a sporadic E-layer and backscattered by the sea surface are digitally perturbed with a known frequency modulation, and the efficiencies of the methods in recovering the perturbation is compared. The influence of the weighting of the estimator and of the number of statistical averages on the quality of the estimates is considered. It is found that, for a number of averages greater than four, the standard deviations of the difference between the estimated and the theoretical perturbation are of the same order of magnitude for the three methods, but that Marple's algorithm yields a less biased estimate. The wave height obtained after removing the artificial modulation is recovered with an accuracy of about 10%.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.