Abstract

Swarms of autonomous agents are useful in many applications due to their ability to accomplish tasks in a decentralized manner, making them more robust to failures. Due to the difficulty in running experiments with large numbers of hardware agents, researchers typically resort to simulations with simplifying assumptions. While some assumptions are tolerable, we feel that two assumptions have been overlooked: one, that agents take up physical space, and two, that a collision avoidance algorithm is available to add safety to an existing algorithm. While there do exist minimally invasive collision avoidance algorithms designed to add safety while minimizing interference in the intended behavior, we show they can still cause unexpected interference. We use an illustrative example with a double-milling behavior and show, through simulations, that the collision avoidance can still cause unexpected interference and careful parameter tuning is needed.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.