Abstract

Fluid injection into rocks is increasingly used for energy extraction and for fluid wastes disposal, and can trigger/induce small- to medium-scale seismicity. Fluctuations in pore fluid pressure may also be associated with natural seismicity. The energy release in anthropogenically induced seismicity is sensitive to amount and pressure of fluid injected, through the way that seismic moment release is related to slipped area, and is strongly affected by the hydraulic conductance of the faulted rock mass. Bearing in mind the scaling issues that apply, fluid injection-driven fault motion can be studied on laboratory-sized samples. Here, we investigate both stable and unstable induced fault slip on pre-cut planar surfaces in Darley Dale and Pennant sandstones, with or without granular gouge. They display contrasting permeabilities, differing by a factor of 105, but mineralogies are broadly comparable. In permeable Darley Dale sandstone, fluid can access the fault plane through the rock matrix and the effective stress law is followed closely. Pore pressure change shifts the whole Mohr circle laterally. In tight Pennant sandstone, fluid only injects into the fault plane itself; stress state in the rock matrix is unaffected. Sudden access by overpressured fluid to the fault plane via hydrofracture causes seismogenic fault slips.This article is part of the themed issue ‘Faulting, friction and weakening: from slow to fast motion’.

Highlights

  • Fluid injection into deep rocks is increasingly used in connection with energy extraction [1,2,3,4,5]

  • Deep fluid injection can raise the pore pressure in hydraulically conductive rocks, or injection into impermeable rocks can raise the fluid pressure in natural faults and fissures [6]

  • Fault slip was provoked by increasing injection fluid pressure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fluid injection into deep rocks is increasingly used in connection with energy extraction [1,2,3,4,5]. Deep injection is widely used for disposal of fluid wastes from manufacturing or of well flowback fluids, and includes injection for underground gas disposal (e.g. CO2) and storage (e.g. natural gas). Deep fluid injection can raise the pore pressure in hydraulically conductive rocks, or injection into impermeable rocks can raise the fluid pressure in natural faults and fissures [6]. In these cases, there is potential to promote fault slip. McGarr et al [11] demonstrated that the size of induced earthquakes scales with the amount of fluid injected and that management of fluid injection was the key to minimizing the hazard of induced earthquakes

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.