Abstract

According to the basic concept of seismic isolation, the base-isolated structures must remain elastic during an earthquake. On the one hand, the existing technical documentation and codes strongly noted that the superstructure of isolated buildings should be designed the same as a fixed base structure. The only difference is the isolator. So, its period is higher, and consequently the applied acceleration is lower. One of the criteria for designing fixed-base structures is a seismic design and especially compact transverse rebars for beams and columns near the support. In the present study, 12 structures of 8 to 24 stories were designed in both fixed and isolated forms. Then, a program was written in MATLAB that calculated “moment-curvature” and “P-Mx-My interaction” curves for concrete beam and column sections with any amount of transverse rebars (Av/s). Having these curves, the structures were push-over analyzed in three sway conditions “ordinary”, “intermediate” and “special”. The results also showed that, unlike fixed-base structures, the response modification factor (Ru) of the isolated structures was not affected by the seismic design level of beams and columns. Also, in the two “target” and “final” displacements, the number of plastic hinges formed in IO or thereafter, in the isolated structures was much less than the fixed ones.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.