Abstract

Introduction. The proposed article critically examines the explanation of the origin of nasal vowels in Slavic languages by incorporating an open syllable law. It is shown that the convergence of many closed syllables, ending with nasal consonants, into two kinds of open syllables with nasal vowels contradicts a number of facts of evolution in the opposite direction, e. g., evolution of nasal vowels towards combinations ”a vowel – a nasal consonant“ in Balkan Slavic languages (Bulg. пент ”five“, вънзел ”knot“), as well as to the observed interpretation of Slavic nasal vowels in acts of borrowing by languages without nasal vowels, e. g. OCS дѫбрава ”oak forest“ > Rom. dumbrávă. Methodology and sources. The proposed model results from generalization of the data of instrumental phonetical research, which show that the articulation of palatal consonants is unstable leading to there divergent evolution, i. e. transformation to sounds with more definite zones of articulation, e. g. palatal lateral approximant *[ʎ] split into palatalized lateral liquid [l'] and fricative [j]. In the proposed model Proto-Indo-European (PIE) syllable velar nasal consonant *ŋ̍ in the process of its phonetic evolution in Indo-European (IE) languages split into a variety of nasal vowels with different articulations, which further on irregularly transformed into vowels without nasalization or into combinations of vowels with nasal consonants (e. g. OInd. paŋktíṣ, OIsl. fimt, Lith. penkì, OCS пѩть, OHG finf, fimf, funf "пять", etc., from the common PIE prototype with syllable nasal *ŋ̍). Results and discussion. Examples of PIE prototypes of lexemes meaning “water bird”, “tooth, sharp edge”, “five”, as well as lexemes, related to Russ. нутро, ядро, неясыть, уж, угорь, нагой, нога, ноготь are presented. All prototypes contain a nasal syllabic, which is split producing four types of reflexes in IE languages. Newly discovered etymological links, such as the connection between Russ. Lexemes meaning “leg” and “corner”, are discussed.Conclusion. The proposed model permits to uniformly explain the facts of synchronous existence of related Rus. недро ”insides“ and ядро ”nucleos“, related нутро и утроба ”belly“, related OCS ѫты, Lith. ántis and AGr. Att. νῆττα “duck”, related Rus. неясыть “a kind of owl; pelican” and ненасытный “insatiable”, etc., using the notion of divergent evolution of the PIE syllable velar nasal *ŋ̍.

Highlights

  • The proposed article critically examines the explanation of the origin of nasal vowels in Slavic languages by incorporating an open syllable law

  • It is widely accepted that Proto-Slavic diphthong-like combinations of vowels and nasal consonants, i. e. combinations VN succeeded by a consonant, where V is a vowel, N is a nasal consonant, should have turned into monophthongs due to the Open Syllables Law

  • The existing model of the genesis of nasal vowels in Slavic languages seemingly does not match the trend toward divergent evolution to more certain sounds: in the accepted model more definite PIE combinations of vowels and nasal consonants temporarily evolved into a small number of nasal vowels with unclear articulation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is widely accepted that Proto-Slavic diphthong-like combinations of vowels and nasal consonants, i. e. combinations VN succeeded by a consonant (not nasal), where V is a vowel, N is a nasal consonant, should have turned into monophthongs due to the Open Syllables Law. As in the previously considered examples, we suggest for this case the typical evolution of the original *[ŋ ]: a) *[ŋ ] > *[jǫ]/*[ję] – OCS ѩдро, ѩдра, Pol. jądrо, jędrnу (with iotization of nasal vowels in initial position), further on to ORuss. Contrary to Vasmer again (and to Baudouin de Courtenay), suggest divergent evolution of PIE preposition / prefix *(w/j)ŋ - > *(w/j)ǫ-/*(w/j)ę- [20]: a) *ŋtVr- > *(w)ǫtr- > OCS ѫтроба, Pol. wątroba "liver" (with labialization of the nasal vowel in initial position), further on to ORuss. Divergence of the PIE velar nasal was a live process in IE languages even after their separation from each other, consider related OInd. áṅghri- "foot" and nakhá- "fingernail", áhis and nāgas "snake" and related Lith. - to explain [n] ~ [m] oscillations in related IE lexemes; - to clarify the historical relations between *VNT and *ǫT/*ęT combinations; - to clear out some new etymological relations, e.g. between Lat. nutrire and Russ. нутро, both being lexemes with a prefix *nu- < *(w)ŋ - (the reflex c)) [22]

СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call