Abstract
Five small cyclic peptides and four implicit water models, were selected for this study. DEEPSAM, a structure prediction algorithm built upon TINKER, was used. Structures predicted using implicit water models were compared with experimental data, and with predictions calculated in the gas phase. The existence of very accurate X-ray crystallographic data allowed firm and conclusive comparisons between predictions and experiment. The introduction of implicit water models into the calculations improved the RMSD from experiment by about 13% compared with computations neglecting the presence of water. GBSA is shown to be consistently the best implicit water model.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
