Abstract
Abstract The electroanalytical behavior of LixNiO2 and LixCo0.2Ni0.8O2 was studied by simultaneous application of slow-scan rate cyclic voltammetry (SSCV), potentiostatic and galvanostatic intermittent titration (PITT and GITT), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Application of a finite-space diffusion model for treating the results obtained by these techniques allowed us to calculate the diffusion coefficient of Li ions (D) and the differential (incremental) capacity (Cint) as functions of the electrode’s potential. Our final purpose was to compare D versus E and Cint versus E plots for both the electrodes, in order to correlate the observed difference in their electroanalytical behavior with the clear distinction in the related Li-insertion mechanisms deduced from XRD studies. While Li insertion into LixCo0.2Ni0.8O2 exhibits a single-phase reaction upon charge in the 3.0–4.08 V (versus Li/Li+) range, Li intercalation into LixNiO2 undergoes two-phase transitions in the same potential range. The shape of both plots, D versus E and Cint versus E for these electrodes, is discussed in the framework of a finite-space diffusion model and Li-insertion processes that can be described by Frumkin-type intercalation isotherms with short-range attraction interactions among intercalation sites.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
