Abstract

Shotgun sequencing is a high-throughput method used to detect copy number variants (CNVs). Although there are numerous CNV detection tools based on shotgun sequencing, their quality varies significantly, leading to performance discrepancies. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of next-generation sequencing-based CNV detection tools over the past decade. Our findings revealed that the majority of mainstream tools employ similar detection rationale: calculates the so-called read depth signal from aligned sequencing reads and then segments the signal by utilizing either circular binary segmentation (CBS) or hidden Markov model (HMM). Hence, we compared the performance of those two core segmentation algorithms in CNV detection, considering varying sequencing depths, segment lengths and complex types of CNVs. To ensure a fair comparison, we designed a parametrical model using mainstream statistical distributions, which allows for pre-excluding bias correction such as guanine-cytosine (GC) content during the preprocessing step. The results indicate the following key points: (1) Under ideal conditions, CBS demonstrates high precision, while HMM exhibits a high recall rate. (2) For practical conditions, HMM is advantageous at lower sequencing depths, while CBS is more competitive in detecting small variant segments compared to HMM. (3) In case involving complex CNVs resembling real sequencing, HMM demonstrates more robustness compared with CBS. (4) When facing large-scale sequencing data, HMM costs less time compared with the CBS, while their memory usage is approximately equal. This can provide an important guidance and reference for researchers to develop new tools for CNV detection.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call