Abstract
We analyze the continuous time zero-sum and cooperative controller-stopper games of Karatzas and Sudderth (Ann Probab 29(3):1111–1127, 2001), Karatzas and Zamfirescu (Ann Probab 36(4):1495–1527, 2008) and Karatzas and Zamfirescu (Appl Math Optim 53(2):163–184, 2006) when the volatility of the state process is controlled as in Bayraktar and Huang (SIAM J Control Optim 51(2):1263–1297, 2013) but additionally when the state process has controlled jumps. We perform this analysis by first resolving the stochastic target problems [of Soner and Touzi (SIAM J Control Optim 41(2):404–424, 2002; J Eur Math Soc 4(3):201–236, 2002)] with a cooperative or a non-cooperative stopper and then embedding the original problem into the latter set-up. Unlike in Bayraktar and Huang (SIAM J Control Optim 51(2):1263–1297, 2013) our analysis relies crucially on the Stochastic Perron method of Bayraktar and Sîrbu (SIAM J Control Optim 51(6):4274–4294, 2013) but not the dynamic programming principle, which is difficult to prove directly for games.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.