Abstract
In this article, we compare the number of unmatched nodes and the size of dilations in two main random network models, the Scale-Free (SF) and Clustered Scale-Free (CSF) networks. The number of unmatched nodes determines the necessary number of control inputs and is known to be a measure for network controllability, while the size of dilation is a measure of controllability recovery in case of control-input failure. Our results show that clustered version of SF networks require fewer control inputs for controllability. Further, the average size of dilations is smaller in CSF networks, implying that potentially fewer options for controllability recovery are available.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
