Abstract

As many paths lead to aggression, understanding which situations and which person-specific traits facilitate or impede aggressive behavior is crucial. Provocation is among one of the most frequently reported predictors of aggressive behavior. However, it remains unclear whether the reaction to provocation is universal across different forms of aggression and whether individuals differ in their reactivity to such signals. Using the Taylor Aggression Paradigm (TAP), we investigated the influence of individual and contextual factors on physical and non-physical aggression in healthy men and women. The impact of trait aggression, sex, provocation, and the success of a competition against a fictitious opponent on aggressive behavior was examined in three different versions of the TAP. While equal provocation and punishment modalities were used in the first two versions, monetary deductions in the first and heat stimulus in the second study, the third experiment used non-physical provocation to trigger physical punishment. Trial-by-trial analyses revealed that provocation, independent of its specific nature, is a strong predictor for aggressive behavior, especially in highly aggressive participants. Although women initially showed less aggression than men, sex differences were diminished under prolonged, increasing provocation when provocation and punishment modality were identical. Only when modalities diverged, women, compared with men, were more hesitant to punish their opponent. These results, thus, extend evidence that women show lower levels of aggression under low provocation. However, high levels of provocation have similar effects on males’ and females’ reactive aggressive behavior across different forms of aggression. When competing for money, losing against the fictitious opponent was functioning as an additional provocative signal stimulating aggressive responses. Differences in aggressive responding have to be interpreted in the context of the specific type of provocation and aggression that is investigated since these modalities are shown to interact with individual characteristics.

Highlights

  • Aggression is a biologically deep-rooted pattern of behavior and primarily serves to acquire and protect resources

  • Results of the TAPheat and TAPmixed version revealed that when physical aggression is involved, the impact of trait aggressiveness on reactivity to provocation differs between men and women

  • In the TAPmixed version, in which nonphysical provocation and physical punishment are paired, trait aggression further boosts the aggressive response to provocation in women, such that with increasing aggressiveness, they show similar reactivity to provocation as men

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Aggression is a biologically deep-rooted pattern of behavior and primarily serves to acquire and protect resources. Among the most popular definitions is that of Baron, who defined human aggression as “any behavior directed toward the goal of harming or injuring another living being that is motivated to avoid such treatment” [1]. Aggression models, such as the frustration-aggression hypothesis (FAH), introduced by Dollard and colleagues in 1939, claim that aggression is always preceded by frustration [2]. Later, this was modified into frustration being a potential trigger for aggression [3]. A number of domain-specific theories and overlapping models of aggression have been developed to explain etiology of aggression and psychological processes related to this behavior [e.g., Ref. [4]]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.