Abstract

L0 sparse methods are not widespread in Direction-Of-Arrival (DOA) estimation yet, despite their potential superiority over classical methods in difficult scenarios. This comes from the difficulties encountered for global optimization on hill-climbing error surfaces. In this paper, we explore the loss landscapes of L0 and Continuous Exact L0 (CEL0) regularized problems in order to design a new optimization scheme. As expected, we observe that the recently introduced CEL0 penalty leads to an error surface with less local minima than the L0 one. This property explains the good behavior of the CEL0-regularized sparse DOA estimation problem for well-separated sources. Unfortunately, CEL0-regularized landscape enlarges L0-basins in the middle of close sources, and CEL0 methods are thus unable to resolve two close sources. Consequently, we propose to alternate between both error surfaces to increase the probability of reaching the global solution. Experiments show that the proposed approach offers better performance than existing ones, and particularly an enhanced resolution limit.

Highlights

  • The study of Direction-Of-Arrival (DOA) estimation has a long history in signal processing

  • We have shown in [12] that traditional suboptimal optimization schemes of CEL0regularized functional as Iterative Reweighted1 (IRL1) or Forward Backward (FB) are unable to resolve close sources

  • The aim of this paper is to investigate the properties of J0 and JCEL0 loss surfaces in order to propose a sparse optimization strategy to resolve close sources

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The study of Direction-Of-Arrival (DOA) estimation has a long history in signal processing. Minimization of a regularized criterion using nonsmooth nonconvex but continuous penalties has drawn considerable attention [16], and it has been shown in many applications that it can yield significantly better performance than with using the1 -norm [17].

On-Grid Array Signal Modeling
Vectorized Covariance Matrix Model
Description and Numerical Investigations of the Minimizers of J0 and JCEL0
Simulation Setup
Minimizers of J0
Minimizers of JCEL0
Alternating between Loss Surfaces
Statistical Performance
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call