Abstract

Abstract. Urban areas struck by disasters such as earthquakes are in need of a fast damage detection assessment. A post-event SAR image often is the first available image, most likely with no matching pre-event image to perform change detection. In previous work we have introduced a debris detection algorithm for this scenario that is trained exclusively with synthetically generated training data. A classification step is employed to separate debris from similar textures such as vegetation. In order to verify the use of a random forest classifier for this context, we conduct a performance comparison with two alternative popular classifiers, a support vector machine and a convolutional neural network. With the direct comparison revealing the random forest classifier to be best suited, the effective performance on the prospect of debris detection is investigated for the post-earthquake Christchurch scene. Results show a good separation of debris from vegetation and gravel, thus reducing the false alarm rate in the damage detection operation considerably.

Highlights

  • IntroductionIn particular earthquakes, cause a strong demand for a fast and reliable detection of structural damages

  • Natural disasters, in particular earthquakes, cause a strong demand for a fast and reliable detection of structural damages

  • The convolutional neural network (CNN) approach achieved an ACC of 67.7%, which is rather poor in comparison

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In particular earthquakes, cause a strong demand for a fast and reliable detection of structural damages. Due to the independence of weather and lighting conditions and the consequentially ensured image availability, many approaches are based on SAR imagery, occasionally in combination with ancillary data (Tao, 2016). In SAR imagery, the most prominent indication for structural damages is the signature caused by heaps of debris surrounding the buildings. Due to its coarse texture, debris can be separated rather well from other signatures caused by urban formations. There are several sources, though, most importantly high vegetation and gravel, that feature a very similar texture in SAR images and make the debris detection approach considerably more difficult

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call