Abstract

The paper aspires to find the reasons for allegedly slow and inefficient decision-making in the EU and in doing so also tries to predict what the future challenges mean for the organisational structure of the EU. It argues that, due to asymmetric challenges, consensus should remain a European asset and that increased heterogeneity of preferences due to rising EU membership is in fact not the major culprit of inefficient decision-making. The paper shows that at least in the medium term the combination of another two factors should be blamed instead: firstly, the blurred division of responsibilities and secondly, the budgetary procedure, which gives incentives to the Member States to approve policies without (sufficient) value-added to the EU. The paper makes a concrete proposal how the budgetary process should be improved in order also to remedy the decision-making inefficiency problem.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.