Abstract

The Schwartz (J Finance 52(3):923–973, 1997) two factor model serves as a benchmark for pricing commodity contracts, futures and options. It is normally calibrated to fit the term-structure of a range of future contracts with varying maturities. In this paper, we investigate the effects on parameter estimates, if the model is fitted to prices of options, with varying maturities and strikes instead of futures, as is commonly done. The use of option prices rather than futures in the calibration leads to non-linearities, which the standard Kalman filter approach is unable to cope with. To overcome these issues, we use the extended Kalman Filter. We find that some parameters sensitively depend on the choice of strikes of the corresponding options, and are different from those estimates obtained from using futures prices. This effect is analogue to varying implied volatilities in the Black–Scholes model. This realization is important, as the use of ill-fitted models for pricing options in the Schwartz (1997) framework may cause traders to bear serious financial losses.

Highlights

  • Crude oil is without doubt one of the most important commodities, strongly tied to industrial and economic growth

  • The Schwartz (J Finance 52(3):923–973, 1997) two factor model serves as a benchmark for pricing commodity contracts, futures and options

  • We investigate the effects on parameter estimates, if the model is fitted to prices of options, with varying maturities and strikes instead of futures, as is commonly done

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Crude oil is without doubt one of the most important commodities, strongly tied to industrial and economic growth. Our paper expands on Schwartz (1997) and Hilliard and Reis (1998) as such as that we estimate the implied spot price and convenience yield of the underlying commodity from options rather than futures. We use the extended Kalman-Filter and prices of European call options on WTI crude oil futures to estimate the Schwartz (1997) model. The motivation for this lies in the fact that option prices carry far more information on the volatility structure of the underlying asset than futures do. Empirical results and conclusions will be discussed in the last section

Mathematical model
The extended Kalman Filter algorithm
Data and assumptions
Empirical results and conclusion
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.