Abstract
This publication is the third in a series of articles devoted to the dominant thesis in traditional Islamic political and legal theology about Jizya as a tribute from Non- Muslims, established by the Prophet Muhammad. The fi rst article analyzed the question of the authenticity, from a formal hadithological point of view (i. e., in the aspect of isnad), of the traditions about Nadjran deputation, and partly about the treaty with the Christians of Najran; in the second, this issue was considered already in a substantial way, referring to the composition of the Christian deputation. The present article continues this substantive analysis, but already in relation to the text of the Jizya treaty. The study is conducted in line with the reformistmodernist discourse, orientated on the disclosure of the tolerant- pluralistic intention of prophetic Islam.
Highlights
(7) Али назван составителем и в версии от ал-Йакуби, но свидетелями здесь выступают [курайшит] Амр ибн ал-Ас ( )عمرو بن العاصи вышеупомянутый ал-Мугира
Касательно «христианской» версии сразу бросается в глаза тот факт, что список свидетелей открывается именами будущих четырёх «праведных халифов», притом они даны здесь в том же порядке, в каком они возглавляли мусульманское государство (Абу Бакр → Умар → Усман → Али)
Summary
Сомнение в аутентичности означенной грамоты значительно возрастет и утвердится при обращении к содержанию грамоты и особенно к списку обозначенных в ней составителя-писца и свидетелей
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.