Abstract

Computational simulation of the Powder Bed Fusion (PBF) process is a useful tool for predicting and analysing melt pool geometry during the deposition process. Advanced models that use Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) can accurately simulate the complex melt pool dynamics of the process but are typically computationally onerous to implement. CFD models require thermophysical data over a large temperature range that may be difficult to acquire for the material systems of interest. Heat conduction models, which are useful to industrial end users are easier to implement, but their accuracy can be compromised. The main difference between heat conduction and CFD modelling is the absence of convection (especially Marangoni convection). However, several sources in literature have highlighted a simple approach to mimicking the effects of Marangoni convection on the melt pool by artificially increasing the thermal conductivity of the liquid. However, due to its simplicity and lack of agreement within literature, the modified heat conduction approach is neither sufficiently robust nor universally consistent. Comparison to experimental data is lacking. In the present work, the heat conduction model is modified using an orthotropic description of anisotropic thermal conductivity in the liquid phase by applying directional correction factors. The correction factors are calibrated by comparing the predicted geometry against experimentally-obtained melt pool dimensions for single-layer, multiple tracks in Ti-6Al-4V processed by laser-PBF. After appropriate correction factors were selected, the modified heat conduction model gave results in good agreement with experiments. To test the general applicability of the approach, data from literature were analysed and simulated using the model. After correction factors were adjusted accordingly, the simulated results were validated over the range of power levels and scan speeds. • Transient thermal conduction model of the laser-based powder bed fusion process. • Melt pool geometry simulated using efficient modelling approach. • Track profile simulated with consolidated deposition geometry on the substrate. • Good agreement with bespoke experimental data and independent data from literature.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.