Abstract
Summary Several authors have worked on combining decline curve analysis (DCA) models and stochastic algorithms for probabilistic DCAs. However, there are no publications on the application of these probabilistic decline curve models to all the major shale basins in the United States. Also, several empirical and analytical decline curve models have been developed to fit historical production data better; there is no systematic investigation of the relevance of the efforts on new model development compared with the efforts to quantify the uncertainty associated with the “noise” in the historical data. This work compares the uncertainty associated with determining the best-fit model (epistemic uncertainty) with the uncertainty associated with the historical data (aleatoric uncertainty) and presents a procedure to find DCA-stochastic algorithm combinations that encompass the epistemic uncertainty. We investigated two Bayesian methods—the approximate Bayesian computation and the Gibbs sampler—and two frequentist methods—the conventional bootstrap (BS) and modified BS (MBS). These stochastic algorithms were combined with five empirical DCA models (Arps, Duong, power law, logistic growth, and stretched exponential decline) and the analytical Jacobi theta-2 model. We analyzed historical production data from 1,800 wells (300 wells from each of the six major shale basins studied) with historical data lengths ranging from 12 to 60 months. We show the errors associated with the assumption of a uniform distribution for the model parameters and present an approach for integrating informative prior (IP) probabilistic distributions instead of the noninformative prior (NIP) or uniform prior distributions. Our results indicate the superior performance of the Bayesian methods, especially at short hindcasts (12–24 months of production history). We observed that the duration of the historical production data was the most critical factor. Using long hindcasts (up to 60 months) leveled the performance of all probabilistic methods regardless of the decline curve model or statistical methodology used. Additionally, we showed that it is possible to find DCA-stochastic model combinations that reflect the epistemic uncertainty in most of the shale basins investigated. The novelty of this work lies in the development of IPs for the Bayesian methodologies and the development of a systematic approach to determine the combination of statistical methods and DCA models that encompasses the epistemic uncertainty. The proposed approach was implemented using open-source software packages to make our results reproducible and to facilitate its practical application in forecasting production in unconventional oil and gas reservoirs.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Decline Curve Analysis Models
Historical Data
Decline Curve Models
Decline Curve Analysis
Historical Production Data
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Oct 3, 2012
ACS Omega
Aug 29, 2022
Apr 1, 2014
Sep 25, 2020
Advances in Geo-Energy Research
Jul 1, 2020
Energies
May 16, 2023
SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
May 1, 2017
Natural Resources Research
Sep 29, 2018
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
Nov 1, 2019
Energies
Nov 23, 2022
May 20, 2023
SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Jan 14, 2021
SPE Production & Operations
Jan 14, 2021
Energies
Mar 5, 2018
SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Nov 8, 2023
SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Sep 28, 2023
SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Sep 22, 2023
SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Aug 28, 2023
SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Aug 17, 2023
SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Aug 15, 2023
SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Aug 10, 2023
SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Aug 9, 2023
SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Jul 27, 2023
SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Jul 24, 2023