Abstract

Evolutionary algorithms are applied as problem-independent optimization algorithms. They are quite efficient in many situations. However, it is difficult to analyze even the behavior of simple variants of evolutionary algorithms like the ( 1 + 1 ) EA on rather simple functions. Nevertheless, only the analysis of the expected run time and the success probability within a given number of steps can guide the choice of the free parameters of the algorithms. Here static ( 1 + 1 ) EAs with a fixed mutation probability are compared with dynamic ( 1 + 1 ) EAs with a simple schedule for the variation of the mutation probability. The dynamic variant is first analyzed for functions typically chosen as example-functions for evolutionary algorithms. Afterwards, it is shown that it can be essential to choose the suitable variant of the ( 1 + 1 ) EA. More precisely, functions are presented where each static ( 1 + 1 ) EA has exponential expected run time while the dynamic variant has polynomial expected run time. For other functions it is shown that the dynamic ( 1 + 1 ) EA has exponential expected run time while a static ( 1 + 1 ) EA with a good choice of the mutation probability has polynomial run time with overwhelming probability.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.