Abstract
Certain assumptions on the movement and signalling of a species, as well as on the dimensionality of the space, give rise to a variety of “spatial models”, and yield some conclusions relative to the gregarious behaviour of that species and the adjustment of the sex ratio in bisexual populations. In the former context, Hamilton's (1971) arguments are affected. In the latter, Kalmus & Smith's (1960) treatment is discussed and elaborated to include pertinent new factors. This is done in a quantitative manner by applying a number of occupancy models. It appears that the sex ratio which maximizes the expected number of fertilized females will be biased towards the mobile sex, subject to the relative fecundity of the males. It is argued that the optimal sex ratio constitutes a socially advantageous but individually disadvantageous character, and may survive under certain conditions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.