Abstract
We present two approaches to the a posteriori error analysis for prescribed mean curvature equations. The main difference between them concerns the estimation of the residual: without or with computable weights. In the second case, the weights are related to the eigenvalues of the underlying operator and thus provide local and computable information about the conditioning. We analyze the two approaches from a theoretical viewpoint. Moreover, we investigate and compare the performance of the derived indicators in an adaptive procedure. Our theoretical and practical results show that it is advantageous to estimate the residual in a weighted way.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
