Abstract

where Sz c R” (n 2 1) is bounded with smooth boundary aQ. Readers interested in the derivation of the problem are referred to the work by Bebernen [l], particularly Section 2. Relevant work on the analysis of this problem has been done by Brown et al. [2], Shivaji [3-61, Hastings and McLeod [7], Sattinger [8], Parks [9] and Tam [lo]. Clearly u = 0 is a solution of (1 .l), when 2 = 0. It follows from the contraction mapping theorem that (l.l), always has a solution for A sufficiently small. Moreover, let

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.