On speech quality assessment of artificial bandwidth extension

Abstract

During the transition to wideband speech telephony, artificial bandwidth extension (ABE) could help to preserve customer satisfaction by enhancing speech quality in case of narrowband (NB) calls. However, the assessment of speech quality for ABE systems is still an open question. In the literature, instrumental measures are often used to judge the quality of ABE solutions. When subjective listening tests are considered, they most often use a comparison category rating (CCR) scale and, more rarely, an absolute category rating (ACR) scale. This paper investigates the relevance of instrumental and subjective assessment methods for ABE systems. An ACR and a CCR test are organized. Their results are compared and discussed. Discrepancies between these two tests open the discussion for the design of a proper subjective listening test for ABE systems. Some instrumental measures are also evaluated. A poor correlation between these measures and the subjective results is observed.