Abstract
In model selection problems, robustness is one important feature for selecting an adequate model from the candidates. We focus on statistical divergence-based selection criteria and investigate their robustness. We mainly consider BHHJ divergence and related classes of divergence measures. BHHJ divergence is a representative robust divergence measure that has been utilized in, for example, parametric estimation, hypothesis testing, and model selection. We measure the robustness against outliers of a selection criterion by approximating the difference of values of the criterion between the population with outliers and the non-contaminated one. We derive and compare the conditions to guarantee robustness for model selection criteria based on BHHJ and related divergence measures. From the results, we find that conditions for robust selection differ depending on the divergence families, and that some expanded classes of divergence measures require stricter conditions for robust model selection. Moreover, we prove that robustness in estimation does not always guarantee robustness in model selection. Through numerical experiments, we confirm the advantages and disadvantages of each divergence family, asymptotic behavior, and the validity for employing criteria on the basis of robust divergence. Especially, we reveal the superiority of BHHJ divergence in robust model selection for extensive cases.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.