Abstract

Bicycle lanes reduce real and perceived risks for bicycle vs. motor vehicle crashes, reducing the burden of traffic injuries and contributing to greater cycling participation. Previous research indicates that the effectiveness of bicycle lanes differs according to roadway characteristics, and that bicycle lane types are differentially associated with reduced crash risks. The aim of this study is to combine these perspectives and identify the types of on-road bicycle lanes that are associated with the greatest reductions in bicycle crashes given the presence of specific roadway characteristics. We compiled a cross sectional spatial dataset consisting of 32,444 intersection polygons and 57,285 street segment polygons representing the roadway network for inner Melbourne, Australia. The dependent measure was a dichotomous indicator for any bicycle crash (2014–2017). Independent measures were bicycle lanes (exclusive bicycle lanes, shared bicycle and parking lanes, marked wide kerbside lanes, and kerbside bicycle lanes) and other roadway characteristics (speed limit, bus routes, tram routes, bridges, one-way flow, traffic lane width). In Bayesian conditional autoregressive logit models, bicycle lanes of all types were associated with decreased crash odds where speeds were greater, bus routes and tram stops were present, and traffic lanes were narrower. Only exclusive bicycle lanes were associated with reduced crash odds (compared to the expected odds given the presence of the bicycle lane and the roadway conditions) in all these setting. The extent to which on-road bicycle lanes reduce crash risks depends on the bicycle lane type, the roadway conditions, and the combination of these two factors. Bicycle lanes that provide greater separation between cyclists and vehicular traffic are most consistently protective.

Highlights

  • Bicycle travel has myriad benefits for individual cyclists and for the broader population (Teschke et al, 2012)

  • The aim of this study is to identify the bicycle lane types that are associated with the greatest reductions in bicycle crashes given the presence of specific roadway characteristics

  • Similar to our previous study in Philadelphia (Kondo et al, 2018) and other published research (Kim and Kim, 2015; Thomas and DeRobertis, 2013), we found bicycle lanes to be most effective on streets with higher speed limits, which have greater volumes of vehicular traffic

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bicycle travel has myriad benefits for individual cyclists and for the broader population (Teschke et al, 2012). Cyclists benefit from improved mental health, improved metabolic and physical functioning, and decreased risks for obesity and resultant problems (de Hartog et al, 2010; Gotschi et al, 2016; Hamer and Chida, 2008). Perceived risks for crashing with a motor vehicle is a considerable barrier to increased participation (Apasnore et al, 2017; Fishman et al, 2012) and cycling rates remain low in many countries (Teschke et al, 2012). Bicycle transit facilities are an effective, low-cost solution that can reduce crash incidence, improve perceived safety, and lead to increases in bicycle travel (Buehler and Dill, 2016; Gu et al, 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call