Abstract

A growing number of papers being published on the CSAMT-MT curve transformation, which — as the authors state — allows a simpler magnetotelluric interpretation of the corrected CSAMT curves. The concept of near‐field corrections is based on electromagnetic relations over a homogeneous earth, and the effects of subsurface layers or lateral inhomogeneities are usually neglected. Bartel and Jacobson (1987) especially suppress the bounds of the near‐field correction: After presenting several near‐field correction curves over a homogeneous earth in their Figure 2 (which includes an idealistic demarcation line instead of a gradual change between near‐field and far‐field regions), they simply add that “…for a layered earth a similar demarcation occurs between the far‐ and near‐field regimes.” Further, the problem of lateral inhomogeneities is not mentioned in the paper. Such a description might lead to an oversimplification. I should like here to underline both limitations.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.