Abstract

AbstractIt is almost a folklore-knowledge that hash-based time-stamping schemes are secure if the underlying hash function is collision-resistant but still no rigorous proofs have been published. We try to establish such proof and conclude that the existing security conditions are improper because they ignore precomputations by adversaries.After analyzing a simplistic patent filing scenario, we suggest a new security condition for time-stamping schemes that leads to a new security property of hash functions – chain-resistance. We observe that if the variety of possible shapes of hash-chains is polynomial (and the verification procedure is suitably improved), then the time-stamping scheme becomes provably secure, assuming that the underlying hash function is collision-resistant. Finally, we show that in some sense, the restrictions in the security definition are necessary – conventional black-box techniques are unable to prove that chain-resistance follows from collision-resistance.KeywordsHash FunctionTuring MachineRandom OracleSecurity ConditionSecurity ProofThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.