Abstract
THE letter of Dr. J. Halm in your number of March 6 is based on two misunderstandings into which the writer could not have fallen if he had seen Arrhenius' original papers (Physikalische Zeitschrift, November 1900), or my description of them in the Popular Science Monthly (January 1902), instead of the friendly but erroneous notice of my paper in the Observatory.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
