Abstract
The separation of aircraft in cruising flight in air corridors is based on the assurance of an extremely low probability of collision due to position inaccuracy caused by navigation errors, atmospheric disturbances, or other factors. The appropriate standard is the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Target Level of Safety (TLS) of frequency of collision less than 5 × 10−9 per flight hour. An upper bound for the collision probability per unit distance is the probability of coincidence, in the case of aircraft flying at the same speed along parallel tracks in the same direction. This leads to the case of two aircraft flying at a constant separation, for which at least three probabilities of coincidence can be calculated: (i) the maximum probability of coincidence at the most likely point; (ii) the cumulative probability of coincidence integrated along the flight path; and (iii) the cumulative probability of coincidence integrated over all space. These three probabilities of coincidence are applied to the old standard and new reduced vertical separations of 2000 ft and 1000 ft respectively, for comparison with the ICAO TLS, and also to assess their suitability as safety metrics. The possibility is raised of complementing the ICAO TLS 5 × 10−9 per hour, which is suitable for the cumulative probability of collision, by two additional safety metrics: (i) one per hour flown squared, which is suitable for comparison with the maximum joint probability density of collision; and (ii) another times hour flown, for comparison with the three-dimensional cumulative probability of coincidence. These three metrics (i) to (iii) have distinct dimensions, give different information, and could be alternatives or supplements.
Highlights
The growth in air transport requires increasing air traffic capacity without degrading safety [1,2,3]
The present paper addresses only the latter (ii) aspect; a simple safety criterion is the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) [10] Target Level of Safety (TLS) specifying a frequency of collision less than 5 × 10−9 per hour
The models of collision probabilities [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23] usually do not explicitly include atmospheric disturbances [24,25,26] and their effects on airplane performance [27,28,29,30,31,32,33] and flight stability [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]; the implication is that the navigation errors, atmospheric disturbances, flight maneuvers, or their combination is such that the position error satisfies a given probability distribution [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]
Summary
The growth in air transport requires increasing air traffic capacity without degrading safety [1,2,3]. The preceding questions can be addressed while requiring a higher level of safety, in a triple trade-off: safety vs capacity/separation vs position/navigation accuracy The answer to these questions is of interest to: (i) the Air Traffic Management (ATM) service providers that should provide adequate capacity while ensuring safety; and (ii) to the developers of navigation and flight control systems to assess the benefits of increased performance of their equipment. Both contribute to the planning of an ATM system that can cope with air traffic growth of 3–7% per year, doubling the number of flights every 10–23 years, which may be regained after the current crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
