Abstract

Bone texture may vary as a function of age, pathology as well as on bone treatments; thus absolute values of specific surface area or porosity are not often reported. A review of the anthropological and archeological references reveals that the results obtained with the current methodologies for the textural analysis of bone may be contradictory. Indeed, the characterization of archeological bone is a very difficult task through conventional techniques. Still, it is most relevant as porosity is the symptom of several pathologies, for instance anemia, osteoporosis, hyperostosis or syphilis.In this work, archeological bone samples – pathological or healthy – were characterized by nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms at −196°C, small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The studied bones are healthy, osteoporotic, hyperostosic, and syphilitic. Porosity, specific surface area, and morphology as well as non conventional features such as roughness, specific surface or fractal dimension, are correlated with the well known macroscopical reported symptoms. The samples come from Moorish Andalucía (Grenade) and Medieval Catalonia (Poblet Monastery).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.