On pacing trials while scanning brain hemodynamics: The case of the SNARC effect.

Abstract

Experimental designs used to describe psychological effects on overt human behavior are seldom suited to localize their corresponding neural substrates based on the analysis of stimulus-evoked brain hemodynamic responses. This is because stimuli in behavioral studies are usually separated by intertrial intervals (ITIs) in the order of 1 second or so following a behavioral response, which is notoriously too brief a time to detect a corresponding hemodynamic response. In fact, a solution commonly adopted in neuroimaging studies is to prolong the ITI up to several seconds. In doing so, the consequences of ITI variations between behavioral and neuroimaging design variants are either benignly neglected or explicitly assumed to be negligible. Here, we provide a systematic investigation of the consequence of manipulating ITI in a design optimized to study a well-established and highly replicable psychological phenomenon-the spatial numerical association of response codes (SNARC). The present exploration encompassed standard estimates of the SNARC effect (i.e., on reaction times and accuracy), estimates of ITI effects on the emotional state of participants before and after performing the SNARC task, as well as the degree of perceived task difficulty. The results showed that, in striking contrast to the common wisdom about the nil role of ITI, the substantial number of parametric differences observed between the two ITI conditions suggests that ITI plays a critical role in shaping the meaning of hemodynamic correlate of a psychological, at least the SNARC, effect.