Abstract

A recently growing literature discusses the topics of direct yaw moment control based on model predictive control (MPC), and energy-efficient torque-vectoring (TV) for electric vehicles with multiple powertrains. To reduce energy consumption, the available TV studies focus on the control allocation layer, which calculates the individual wheel torque levels to generate the total reference longitudinal force and direct yaw moment, specified by higher level algorithms to provide the desired longitudinal and lateral vehicle dynamics. In fact, with a system of redundant actuators, the vehicle-level objectives can be achieved by distributing the individual control actions to minimize an optimality criterion, e.g., based on the reduction of different power loss contributions. However, preliminary simulation and experimental studies – not using MPC – show that further important energy savings are possible through the appropriate design of the reference yaw rate. This paper presents a nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) implementation for energy-efficient TV, which is based on the concurrent optimization of the reference yaw rate and wheel torque allocation. The NMPC cost function weights are varied through a fuzzy logic algorithm to adaptively prioritize vehicle dynamics or energy efficiency, depending on the driving conditions. The results show that the adaptive NMPC configuration allows stable cornering performance with lower energy consumption than a benchmarking fuzzy logic TV controller using an energy-efficient control allocation layer.

Highlights

  • E LECTRIC vehicles (EVs) are the subject of intensive research as they are considered a key solution to reduce air Manuscript received January 21, 2020; revised June 10, 2020 and July 28, 2020; accepted August 21, 2020

  • The previous studies show the energy saving potential of shaping the reference cornering response, to be practically useful, the implementation of this approach should: i) simultaneously account for the power losses associated with the powertrains and tire slip; ii) be based on feedback control structures, e.g., capable of compensating unexpected EV behavior caused by the variation of system parameters or transients, rather than using simplified feedforward or rule-based algorithms; iii) integrate the reference direct yaw moment generation and control allocation functions, to prevent conflicts between different control layers involved in the power loss management; and iv) provide significant operational flexibility depending on the actual driving situation, i.e., prioritize energy efficiency during normal driving, and vehicle safety and stability in extreme maneuvers

  • The nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) TV system is implemented in the simulation framework defined in Fig. 1, and compared with other controller configurations, which are introduced in Sections V.A and V.B

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

E LECTRIC vehicles (EVs) are the subject of intensive research as they are considered a key solution to reduce air Manuscript received January 21, 2020; revised June 10, 2020 and July 28, 2020; accepted August 21, 2020. The previous studies show the energy saving potential of shaping the reference cornering response, to be practically useful, the implementation of this approach should: i) simultaneously account for the power losses associated with the powertrains and tire slip; ii) be based on feedback control structures, e.g., capable of compensating unexpected EV behavior caused by the variation of system parameters or transients, rather than using simplified feedforward or rule-based algorithms; iii) integrate the reference direct yaw moment generation and control allocation functions, to prevent conflicts between different control layers involved in the power loss management; and iv) provide significant operational flexibility depending on the actual driving situation, i.e., prioritize energy efficiency during normal driving, and vehicle safety and stability in extreme maneuvers.

Simulation framework
High-Fidelity Vehicle Model and Case Study EV
Power Loss Contributions
Energy-Efficient Rear-to-Total Wheel Torque Distribution
Reference Understeer Characteristics
Energy-Efficient Reference Yaw Rate
Control Structure
Internal Model Formulation
Optimal Control Problem Formulation
Controller Implementation and Selection of Prediction Horizon and Time Step
Analyzed EV Controller Configurations
Benchmarking TV Controller
Skidpad Tests
Obstacle Avoidance
Driving Cycles
Summary and Discussion
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.