Abstract
Abstract A physical magnetic field has a divergence of zero. Numerical error in constructing a model field and computing the divergence, however, introduces a finite divergence into these calculations. A popular metric for measuring divergence is the average fractional flux . We show that scales with the size of the computational mesh, and may be a poor measure of divergence because it becomes arbitrarily small for increasing mesh resolution, without the divergence actually decreasing. We define a modified version of this metric that does not scale with mesh size. We apply the new metric to the results of DeRosa et al., who measured for a series of nonlinear force-free field models of the coronal magnetic field based on solar boundary data binned at different spatial resolutions. We compute a number of divergence metrics for the DeRosa et al. data and analyze the effect of spatial resolution on these metrics using a nonparametric method. We find that some of the trends reported by DeRosa et al. are due to the intrinsic scaling of . We also find that different metrics give different results for the same data set and therefore there is value in measuring divergence via several metrics.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.