On-line multi-gas component measurement in the mud logging process based on Raman spectroscopy combined with a CNN-LSTM-AM hybrid model

Abstract

The qualitative and quantitative analysis of gas components extracted from drilling fluids during mud logging is essential for identifying drilling anomalies, reservoir characteristics, and hydrocarbon properties during oilfield recovery. Gas chromatography (GC) and gas mass spectrometers (GMS) are currently used for the online analysis of gases throughout the mud logging process. Nevertheless, these methods have limitations, including expensive equipment, high maintenance costs, and lengthy detection periods. Raman spectroscopy can be applied to the online quantification of gases at mud logging sites due to its in-situ analysis, high resolution, and rapid detection. However, laser power fluctuations, field vibrations, and the overlapping of characteristic peaks of different gases in the existing online detection system of Raman spectroscopy can affect the quantitative accuracy of the model. For these reasons, a gas Raman spectroscopy system with a high reliability, low detection limits, and increased sensitivity has been designed and applied to the online quantification of gases in the mud logging process. The near-concentric cavity structure is used to improve the signal acquisition module in the gas Raman spectroscopic system, thus enhancing the Raman spectral signal of the gases. One-dimensional convolutional neural networks (1D-CNN) combined with long- and short-term memory networks (LSTM) are applied to construct quantitative models based on the continuous acquisition of Raman spectra of gas mixtures. In addition, the attention mechanism is used to futher improve the quantitative model performance. The results indicated that our proposed method has the capability to continuously on-line detect 10 hydrocarbon and non-hydrocarbon gases in the mud logging process. The limitation of detection (LOD) for different gas components based on the proposed method are in the range of 0.0035%–0.0223%. Based on the proposed CNN-LSTM-AM model, the average detection errors of different gas components range from 0.899% to 3.521%, and their maximum detection errors range from 2.532% to 11.922%. These results demonstrate that our proposed method has a high accuracy, low deviation, and good stability and can be applied to the on-line gas analysis process in the mud logging field.