Abstract

3D Concrete printing requires much more elaborate quality control procedures compared to conventional concrete processing. Due to the various process steps, and the corresponding variation in material behaviour, time-, and length-scales, a single quality indicator and measurement technique (similar to the ‘slump test’ for traditional construction) cannot be selected. Instead, three families of quality indicators have been established: homogeneity during material production and deposition (quality variations), material evolution during printing (transient material behaviour), and macroscopic features and geometric conformity during printing and of the final object (geometry). For each family, quality assessment techniques which have been proven in other fields or for different applications, have been successfully transferred and adapted to the 3DCP process. In some cases, completely new methods have been developed. This paper aims to provide the state-of-the-art in such quality assessment methods, indicating high potential methods and research gaps across all scale levels of 3D concrete printing processes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.