Abstract
Recently, it has been proposed that, by the randomizing texturing of the surface of a sheet of material of refractive index n , the internal light intensity can be enhanced by a factor of up to 2n^{2} . This proposal subsequently has been challenged with an enhancement of 8n , argued to be the correct figure. The difference is shown to be due to an error in the latter argument. With the error removed, it also supports the original figure of 2n^{2} enhancement.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
