On Informality - Programmed Spontaneity in Spatial Design

Abstract

In the history of European-based classical architecture, the concept of formalism has often been understood as a deviation from canonical form. Until the cultural changes introduced by the Romantic movement in the nineteenth century, the repetition of established formal rules was prevalent in architectural theory and practice. However, the last two hundred years have shown an increasing fascination with the possibility of incorporating the features of “architecture without architects” in the discourse and practice of conventional design, progressively codifying them into theoretical and formal canons. On an urban and territorial scale, the formal characteristics of the so-called informal settlements are currently being systematised and subsequently replicated in design practice. This is exacerbated by market economy and by the broad subject of taste. The aesthetic of spontaneity and the induction of informality have become established architectural concepts, criteria and goals. The differences between the needs of rapidly expanding built territories (in rich or in poor contexts) and those which face mainly punctual adaptations have become clearer, as they often require conflicting approaches. Therefore, the degree of informality enabled in the design process and desired as a design purpose is a key conceptual and practical factor in contemporary spatial planning.