Abstract

Neutral particle analyzers (NPA) detect neutralized energetic particles that escape from plasmas. Geometric factors relate the counting rate of the detectors to the intensity of the particle source. Accurate geometric factors enable quick simulation of geometric effects without the need to resort to slower Monte Carlo methods. Previously derived expressions [G. R. Thomas and D. M. Willis, "Analytical derivation of the geometric factor of a particle detector having circular or rectangular geometry," J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 5(3), 260 (1972); J. D. Sullivan, "Geometric factor and directional response of single and multi-element particle telescopes," Nucl. Instrum. Methods 95(1), 5-11 (1971)] for the geometric factor implicitly assume that the particle source is very far away from the detector (far-field); this excludes applications close to the detector (near-field). The far-field assumption does not hold in most fusion applications of NPA detectors. We derive, from probability theory, a generalized framework for deriving geometric factors that are valid for both near and far-field applications as well as for non-isotropic sources and nonlinear particle trajectories.

Highlights

  • Neutral particle analyzers (NPA) detect neutralized energetic particles (EP) that escape from plasmas

  • A geometric factor relates the particle source intensity and the counting rate of the detector by a multiplicative scale factor that depends on the detector geometry

  • II we show that previously derived expressions1,2 for the geometric factor, while perfectly adequate for astrophysical systems, cannot be applied to NPA detectors due to near-field effects

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Neutral particle analyzers (NPA) detect neutralized energetic particles (EP) that escape from plasmas. Previous expressions for geometric factors can only be applied to systems with isotropic particle sources that move in straight lines. For an isotropic distribution of incident particles, the total geometric factor of the detector is given by θm fg = 2π S(θ ) sin θ cos θ dθ, (2)

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.