Abstract

We define a symmetric monodical pairing G ◦ H among simply connected co-H spaces G and H with the property that S(G◦H) is equivalent to the smash product G∧H as co-H spaces. We further generalize the Whitehead product map to a map G ◦ H → G ∨ H whose mapping cone is the cartesian product. Whitehead products have played an important role in unstable homotopy. They were originally introduced [Whi41] as a bilinear pairing of homotopy groups: πm(X)⊗ πn(X) → πm+n−1(X), m, n > 1. This was generalized ([Ark62], [Coh57], [Hil59]) by constructing a map W: S(A ∧B) → SA ∨ SB. Precomposition with W defines a function on based homotopy classes: [SA,X]× [SB,X] → [S(A ∧B), X], which is bilinear in case A and B are suspensions. The case where A and B are Moore spaces was central to the work of Cohen, Moore and Neisendorfer ([CMN79]). In [Ani93] and in particular [AG95], this work was generalized. Much of this has since been simplified in [GT10], but further understanding will require a generalization from suspensions to co-H spaces. The purpose of this work is to carry out and study such a generalization. Let CO be the category of simply connected co-H spaces and co-H maps. We define a functor CO × CO → CO, (G,H) → G ◦H, and a natural transformation (1) W: G ◦H → G ∨H generalizing the Whitehead product map. The existence of G◦H generalizes a result of Theriault [The03] who showed that the smash product of two simply connected co-associative co-H spaces is the suspension of a co-H space. We do not need the coH spaces to be co-associative and require only one of them to be simply connected. We call G ◦H the Theriault product of G and H. Received by the editors November 28, 2009 and, in revised form, June 8, 2010. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 55P99, 55Q15, 55Q20, 55Q25. 1In fact we can define G ◦ H for any two co-H spaces but require at least one of them to be either simply connected or a suspension in order to obtain the co-H space structure map on G◦H. Recently Grbic, Theriault and Wu have shown that the smash product of any two co-H spaces is the suspension of a co-H space, but their construction cannot satisfy Theorem 1(a) below [GTW]. c ©2011 American Mathematical Society Reverts to public domain 28 years from publication 6143

Highlights

  • The purpose of this work is to carry out and study such a generalization

  • The existence of G◦H generalizes a result of Theriault [The03] who showed that the smash product of two connected co-associative co-H spaces is the suspension of a co-H space

  • We summarize our results in the following theorems

Read more

Summary

Now we factor e and note that it contains the composition

It follows that f and g induce maps that commute with e1 and e2 and with the equivalences of Proposition 2.1, θ and ψ. The co-H structures defined by these maps are equivalent to the structures defined by ν2 : G −ν→1 SX −S−→1 SΩG, ν1 : H −ν→2 SY −S−Ω−→2 SΩH, and we have a homotopy commutative ladder: SX ∧ Y 1∧ 2 / X ∧ H 1∧ν2 / SX ∧ Y 1∧1 / G ∧ Y ν1∧1 / SX ∧ Y. where T is the telescope defined by 1 + (ν1 ∧ 1)( 1 ∧ 1)(1 ∧ ν2)(1 ∧ 2). G ◦ H → G ◦ SΩH G ∧ ΩH is a co-H map by Proposition 2.3 Since this map has a left homotopy inverse, the co-H structure is determined by that on G.

Then we consider the composite
ΩH is
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.